🔗 Share this article

The federal appeals court has upheld a prohibition on sending national guard in Portland, Oregon, following a recent court ruling.

Judicial Panel Agrees to Rehear Legal Matter

The ninth circuit court of appeals ruled on this week that it would rehear the legal dispute concerning the president’s authority with an expanded group of 11 judges. The judicial body also vacated a previous decision from a three-judge panel that had sided with the federal government.

Ongoing Dispute Over Military Presence

This order represents the latest development in a protracted court case over whether the former president has the authority and valid reason to deploy state military units in Portland. Approximately 200 federalized guard members have been in limbo since the end of September when the deployment effort was started in due to ongoing demonstrations.

Conflicting Arguments

The administration has claimed that government employees at the immigration center in south Portland were under attack, while local authorities assert that local officers have command of the circumstances.

In defiance of characterizations of Portland as “war ravaged”, residents have been sharing footage of lush hiking trails and a vibrant culinary culture, and planning events such as an protest bicycle event against the “militarization of our city”.

Court Proceedings

The appeals court decision came after a federal judge in Portland issued two temporary restraining orders this month – one preventing the federal control of the Oregon national guard, and another prohibiting the use of any national guard troops in Oregon, after attempts to circumvent the first order by calling up troops from California.

On Monday, the appeals court had temporarily suspended the initial decision – permitting command of 200 Oregon national guard – but the second ruling remained in place, preventing the actual deployment of the troops.

En Banc Review

The latest ruling means the matter will be heard by the full court – with both rulings under review simultaneously – by a group of 11 judges.

“This ruling demonstrates that facts are important and that the judicial system are striving to hold this administration accountable. The founding document restricts the president’s power, and Oregon’s communities cannot be treated as a training ground for unchecked federal authority,” stated the state attorney general in a official comment.

“The court is sending a clear message: the executive leader cannot send the military into US cities unnecessarily. We will continue protecting Oregon’s laws, values, and autonomy as this legal proceeding moves forward and our fight continues in the courts.”